![]() ![]() A red and green child and two red parents for this project, red/green/red/green for step-children and so on. HK, could you do a set? Like it is for adoption. Fainites barley scribs 21:21, (UTC) Paddling your own canoe? Rowing upstream? Pulling against the tide? Fainites barley scribs 21:22, (UTC) Actually that image could encompass a lot. ![]() ![]() Tobit2 ( talk) 04:38, (UTC) Well its an improvement on oafs. A picture of an oar perhaps, a symbol of determination against the odds. Maybe we can even make a symbol out of this of the project. To save space in the most recent edit of the page, I hand to come up with an acronym for the long title of, "Orphaned, abandoned, and removed children," making it into O.A.R. Tobit2 ( talk) 00:23, (UTC) You mean just a red and green child, say, and one or two red figures on one side? Fainites barley scribs 07:45, (UTC) That sounds okay. Am I off base? Tobit2 ( talk) 00:08, (UTC) Hitsuji, to your point about making your own graphics: what if we took your image and focused it only on the child but on the side added a mother figure whom the child is torn or seperated from? That would seem to fit the point of, the orphan, abandoned, or removed child. My primary reason: the image speaks for adoption, what about people who didn't get adopted. So no problem there.Peronally, I prefer the Anne photo. Fainites barley scribs 20:30, (UTC) The Anne of Green Gables image is clear on copy-right issues the author gave permission. Neat, simple, non-culturally specific and designed specially for this project. Thus I'd like to treat whatever image we use as a kind of branindg of our project in Wikipedia.- Hitsuji Kinno ( talk) 15:23, (UTC) I prefer the logo. Plus it's not something other projects tend to do. I also vote down the last option because humans are visually oriented creatures so it may be hard to recognize our project with different images. It may cause confusion about what the project is really about.All other projects I've seen have made their own graphics for their projects.Who wants to start voting? Tobit2 ( talk) 16:07, (UTC) Comment: I'd rather avoid any copyrighted image even with Fair Use justification for 3 reasons. Vote for having multiple banners with different photos, depending on the article.Sister Irene Photo (Lead photo on Adoption article).Anne of Green Gables] (current graphic).I suggest we vote on which graphic to use for the lead or, perhaps, vote to have multiple banners and userboxes, varying by article. I added the initial graphic although I'm not sure whether it best. (I have graphics training, so why not).- Hitsuji Kinno ( talk) 13:39, (UTC) It's a great idea to add more banner graphics. If this one isn't suitable, please tell me why, and I'll try to come up with something else. I also chose not to picture a little baby because there are older adoptees and people in the foster care system, so I was trying really hard to show universality and equality. I chose *not* to go with real human colors because of the issues involved with choosing that. The line of separation which I think plays a role in most adoptee's lives. This line is the adoption/fostering, etc. The child is split into two and has a line running through them of a different color. ![]() I was careful to make the child, the parents all unisex. The left side shows one set of parents and the other side shows another. (I have a bigger resolution as well if needed). C.Ronaldo willing to volunteer to make an image that's not copyrighted or volunteer my current image towards this project as this project's symbol towards fostering and adoption. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |